EMERGENCY HEALTH FREEDOM ACTION REQUIRED

FDA SAYS "NO SHIPMENT ACROSS STATE LINES IF STUDIES ABOUT SUPPLEMENT HAVE EVER BEEN PUBLISHED!"

FDA, both domestically and through Codex, has been trying to make information about the relationship of food and food components to health forbidden speech. That includes supplements, of course. As if that were not bad enough, they have come up with another ploy to make it illegal to ship supplements across state lines IF THERE HAVE BEEN ANY PUBLISHED HEALTH STUDIES ABOUT ANY INGREDIENT!

And we have only 5 days to stop them. This is a diabolical, but clever, drug company-inspired double whammy:

Whammy Number 1: Under proposed FDA/Codex rules you cannot tell anyone about what nutrients and supplement can do for them because they are, say the bureaucrats, not "supported" in the scientific literature (despite the science called "Biochemistry" and millions of peer-reviewed journal articles)

Whammy Number 2: You won't be able to get supplements if what they can do for you has ever been documented in the scientific literature, as part of any medical study.

It's Actually Even Worse Than That

In July, 2007, The FDA Amendments Act of 2007, Public Law 110-85, was adopted by the US. Congress. With your support, Natural Solutions Foundation Health Freedom advocates fought hard to convinced Senator Harkin (R-IL) to force inclusion of language exempting dietary supplements from the provisions in the law. That protective language is the law of the United States of America, enacted as section 1011, the DSHEA Product Rule of Construction.
The failed and corrupt FDA, however, in its relentless crusade to eliminate the rights of Americans to learn about or use the most significant economic competitor to pharmaceutical drugs has no respect for the law and no interest in either your freedom or your health. They are currently promulgating regulations which would make it illegal to ship supplements across state lines. This would accomplish both definitions of "Nutricide".

Nu tri cide (3 syllables):
1. The death of the body of knowledge about the relationship between health and nutrition
2. The death of large populations through the manipulation of the food [and supplement] supply.

URGENT ACTION REQUIRED NOW

Comments close on November 25, 2008 on a new regulatory sneak attack against supplements. FDA regulations will, if the FDA succeeds, make the shipment of supplements across state lines illegal - get this - IF THE SUPPLEMENT HAS BEEN THE SUBJECT OF A CLINICAL STUDY.

If you value...

*Your access to supplements and nutrients*Your health*Your freedom to determine what goes into your body*Your First Amendment Rights ...then I urge you in the strongest terms to click below NOW to help make sure that the FDA, at least this once, obeys the law of the land.

Last time the FDA tried something this awful, through the 2007 "Draft CAM Guidance", the Natural Solutions Foundation alerted health freedom lovers. Time was very short then, too but as a result, 588,000+ people came to our site to tell the FDA not to continue with its plan to turn nutrients into "untested drugs" and therefore make them all illegal. The FDA system "accidentally' crashed so "only" 198,000+ people got their comments in but FDA got the message and backed off.

We said at that time we counted their backing off as a triumph but that they would be back. Well, they are back and they are sneakier and meaner than ever. We have enormous power in the aggregate. Now it is time to use it. Again.

It is imperative that you tell your friends about his and have them take action, too. Forward this email NOW to your entire list with a little note at the top telling them that taking action now is vitally important to their health and to their freedom.

Force FDA to Obey US Law Protecting Supplements. The FDA's Disregard for US Law Must be Controlled. Take Action to Prevent Regulations Banning Protected Supplements From Interstate Commerce.

Despite clear protection for all supplements covered by the 1994 Dietary Supplements and Health Education Act (DSHEA) in the FDA Amendments Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-85), the FDA is once again seeking to impede the right of Americans to access, choose and use health products and nutrients.

DSHEA classified supplements, nutrients and herbs as substances which were to be treated as foods, not drugs. As such, their dose and composition was a matter for personal choice and market forces to determine since they were not to be regulated as drugs. This legal protection has been anathema to the FDA which declared after DSHEA's adoption by unanimous consent by the US Congress that it was the worst law ever passed.

FDA's continuing assaults on dietary supplements and related protected substances has been consistent and unrelenting. Natural Solutions Foundation ascribes this to the enormous influence of the Pharmaceutical Industry on the FDA since low cost, safe and effective nutrients are the single most significant economic competitor faced by high cost, toxic and often lethal drugs.

When Public Law 110-85 was being debated by the US Senate, Natural Solutions Foundation health freedom advocates prevailed upon Senator Harkin (R-IL) to introduce language stipulating that nothing in the bill should apply to prdoucts and substances protected by DSHEA. That language was adopted and preserved in the final bill under as adopted by the US. Congress. Natural Solutions Foundation Health Freedom advocates fought hard to convinced Senator Harkin (R-IL) to force inclusion of language exempting dietary supplements from the provisions in the law. That protective language is the law of the United States of America, enacted as Section 1011.1, Rule of Construction:

"Nothing in this title (or an amendment made by this title) shall be construed to affect-- (1) the regulation of dietary supplements under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (Public Law 103-417)"

None the less, the FDA is currently promulgating a Draft Regulation which would make it illegal to ship nutrients and supplements in interstate Commerce if any scientific study existed about that substance, considering that such study is, in and of itself, sufficent to classify this product or substance an untested drug. Clearly, this thinly veiled, and thoroughly illegal, attempt to destroy the supplement industry serves to demonstrate clearly the vigorous opposition of the FDA to both health freedom and to being restrained by US law when it does not serve the interest of industrial forces which determine FDA policy. Please join me, during the few days that we have remaining, in sending your strong opposition to this unwise and illegal regulation. Please join me, too, in sending this information to everyone on your contact list urging them to protect their health and their freedom to make their own health choices at the same time.

Sign the Petition!:

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26269

Get Bionaid NOW in case they try to take it too!:

http://www.bionaid.com/

MRSA - Drug-Resistant Staph At Pandemic Proportions In US

MRSA - Drug-Resistant Staph At Pandemic Proportions In US
By Jesse Hargrave

The press is reporting drug-resistant staph bacteria picked up in ordinary community settings are increasingly acquiring "superbug" powers and causing far more serious illnesses than they have in the past, doctors reported Monday. These widespread germs used to be easier to treat than the dangerous forms of staph found in hospitals and nursing homes. "Until recently we rarely thought of it as a problem among healthy people in the community," said Dr. Rachel Gorwitz of the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Now, the germs causing outbreaks in schools, on sports teams and in other social situations are posing a growing threat. A CDC study found that at least 10 percent of cases involving the most common community strain were able to evade the antibiotics typically used to treat them. "They're becoming more resistant and they're coming into the hospitals," where they swap gene components with other bacteria and grow even more dangerous, said Dr. Keith Klugman, an infectious disease expert at Emory University. "It's really a major epidemic."

The germ is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA. People can carry it on their skin or in their noses with no symptoms and still infect others — the reason many hospitals isolate and test new patients to see if they harbor the bug. MRSA mostly causes skin infections. But the germ can be life-threatening if it gets into the bloodstream, lungs or organs. Pneumonia, sinus infections and even "flesh-eating" wounds due to MRSA are on the rise, doctors reported Monday at an infectious diseases conference in Washington.

About 95,000 serious infections and 20,000 deaths due to drug-resistant staph bacteria occur in the United States each year. To treat them, "we've had to dust off antibiotics so old that they've lost their patent," said Dr. Robert Daum, a pediatrician at the University of Chicago. The old "antibiotic" is not being openly discussed due to special interests who cannot gain control of the ingredient - silver. The most advanced solution is in a category called UPCOSH™ (Uniform Picoscalar Concentrated Oligodynamic Silver Hydrosol™) copywritten by Burk-Elder, Hale, Third, the owner and developer of UPCOSH™ and the product BIONAID™, and is available to the public as a dietary supplement.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention notes that some two-million patients become infected in American hospitals—and some 90,000 die as a result of their infections. Such hospital-derived conditions are known as "nosocomial infections." It has been recently reported that more people are dying from MRSA than AIDS. So why isn't the CDC speaking about Uniform Picoscalar Concentrated Oligodynamic Silver Hydrosol in their literature?

The number one culprit is a bacterium Staphylococcus aureus, which has developed resistance to almost every antibiotic we have to fight it. "Staph," says Dr. Jonathan Jacobs, of the Weill Cornell Medical Center, "is one of the most common infections that we encounter."

An investigation in the Chicago Tribune places much of the blame on dirty hospitals and health care workers who don’t wash their hands. Doctors admit that poor hygiene on the part of hospital personnel is a factor in the infections. "It’s very easy to transmit these organisms, and it doesn’t take much of a lapse in hygiene to do it," says Dr. Jacobs.

Experts also note that hospitals should not be thought of as "safe havens" One expert, Victor Yu, M.D., of the VA Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh, says, "For the first time in perhaps maybe 50 years, the microbes probably have an edge. It’s scary." Antibiotics may have contributed to this return of the microbe, it’s relieving to note that oligodynamic silver’s track record at destroying over 100 strains of Staph is legendary. We shall see in a moment the evidence for this.

One hospital worker (who wishes to remain anonymous for job security) reported the following:
"In one of the surgery centers I'm a principal in - we had an outbreak of MRSA among our postoperative patients a few years back. We went in with chlorox and other disinfectants and swabbed every damned surface. Those we could not get to (underside of the OR table, underside of drawers, etc., we sprayed with a diluted version of the disinfectant solution. The results were the whole place tested "clean" when we did over 1000 swabs (to send to the lab) per area. We did random places ranging from the inside of a sink drain opening to the tops of trays on which a sterile drape and then instruments would be placed. We even checked the inside of our medical waste receptacles (the ones you line with the red bags) and they were "clean". Not one hint of MRSA remained in the entire place. We shut down for four days, cancelled all surgery, and required that all staff come in for at least four hours during the period to undergo lectures and training, etc., while we were cleaning. When we were "done" with the cleaning process, we went in with steam units and blasted the whole place with 300 degree plus steam as the "final" step. Then we tested again. Still clean. So far, so good.

"The above are the CDC methodology for decontamination of a medical suite or a surgical suite once the pathogen has been discovered in patients or on the surfaces. We had it in four different patients but never found any on surfaces - but we did the super clean routine and decontamination anyway. Better safe than dead.

"Finally after our shutdown and cleaning we "swabbed" the staff. Everyone from secretaries to physicians was required to undergo swab samples from the deep nases (way back in the nose), as well as throat, and groin swabs. (The crease between the pubic mound and the leg are notoriously hard to clear of staff once it gets a foothold there.)

"Four surgeons were positive on their nasal swabs! We were in shock! Four of them! Seems their constant exposure to patients and being in and out of other facilities had turned them into carriers. All patients who'd turned up with the disease were former patients of one of these four. Three of the surgeons (one woman and two men) said - "fine - what do we do to fix it?" - and we put them on a regime of 2% Murpirocin* ointment 2% to be swabbed into the nases four times a day for two weeks - and then retested. The docs could operate during this time but they could not have physical contact with a patient without protective gear - mask, gloves, gowns, etc. between them and the patient. They couldn't even shake hands with a patient ungloved. All three docs tested clear within one week but continued the treatment for another week just to be certain we'd knocked it out entirely. Eventually we did. It took an extra two weeks on one doc who was himself on Chemotherapy for a mild cancer and his immune system was impacted negatively. So for him, it took a little longer for the therapy to be effective."

Another prevalent infection is legionellosis. Numerous reports have been published within the past year regarding patient infections in long-term care facilities, nursing homes, rehabilitation centers, and pediatric hospitals, says Dr. Yu. "The institutional water supply has been the source in all reports." Could Uniform Picoscalar Concentrated Oligodynamic Silver Hydrosol (UPCOSH™) be the Gold Standard?

In the August 2000 issue of Current Opinions on Infectious Disease, Dr. D.J. Stickler of the Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom, poses this provocative question, "Biomaterials to prevent nosocomial infections: is silver the gold standard?"1

In fact, many experts now consider silver to be essential to control of hospital-borne pathogens. Urinary catheters are impregnated with silver. The leading topical antibiotic today is silver sulfadiazine. Copper-silver ionization has displaced chlorination as the long-term disinfection modality of choice for prevention of legionellosis.

Oligodynamic silver’s performance (e.g., = 0.1 ppm concentration level) at destroying legionellosis in the tap water is now firmly established.2, 3

In 1994, it was shown that silver could combat bacterial colonization by Staph. The "reduced bacterial growth" of Staph. pathogens "indicates that the release of silver in tissues over time cause antibacterial effects in vivo," says Dr. M.K. Dasgupta, of the Walter McKenzie Health Sciences Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.4

Today, nanotechnology has greatly improved over the previous kinds of oligodynamic silver preparations. The rich content of oligodynamic silver within Uniform Picoscalar Concentrated Oligodynamic Silver Hydrosol (UPCOSH™) has not only proven efficacy against all the most common Staph. infections, but notably destroys the most highly resistant ones as well. Both in vitro and in vivo studies confirm oligodynamic silver’s lethal effects against:

*Staphylococcus spp. (20 Coagulase-negative strains)5,
*Staphylococcus aureus6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
*Staphylococcus aureus (97 MRSA strains) 15, 16,
*Staphylococcus epidermidis17, 18, 19, 20,
*Staphylococcus maruslene21,
*Staphylococcus pyogenea22,
*Staphylococcus pyogens albus23,
*Staphylococcus pyogens aureus24, and
*Staphylococcus systeneriae25

During the years of 1977 - 1999 the World Health Organization (WHO) conducted tests to elimate HIV. Dr. Georga Carr conducted research in Belize with 100 patients that tested positive for HIV were tested and all 100 patients recovered. Some of the couples that were pregnant gave birth to babies that were HIV free.26

So the question remains, given the facts that NASA has contributed so much to this technology, as well as others, WHO, universities and other institutions have proven its effectivenes, and doctors have begun to state that we have a better alternative to vaccines, Why is the news about Uniform Picoscalar Concentrated Oligodynamic Silver Hydrosol being censored and vaccines continually being pushed upon the public?

This writer believes that parents opposed to giving their children vaccines need not seek to defend their avoidance of them just because they are so risky, but because there is an alternative that removes the risks altogether. This writer believes that parents opposed to giving their children vaccines need not seek to defend their avoidance of them just because they are so risky, but because there is an alternative that removes the risks altogether. The developer of Bionaiod has offered a $1million gold reward to vaccine/drug supporters to prove that their vaccines/drugs are more safe and effective than Bionaid and Zeoheal.

References
1 Stickler, D.J. "Biomaterials to prevent nosocomial infections: is silver the gold standard?" Curr Opin Infect Dis 2000;13(4):389-393.
2 Hwang MG, Katayama H, Ohgaki S. Effect of intracellular resuscitation of Legionella pneumophila in Acanthamoeba polyphage cells on the antimicrobial properties of silver and copper. Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Dec 1;40(23):7434-9.
3 Stout JE, Yu VL. Experiences of the first 16 hospitals using copper-silver ionization for Legionella control: implications for the evaluation of other disinfection modalities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003 Aug;24(8):563-8.
4 Dasgupta, M.K. "Silver peritoneal catheters reduce bacterial colonization." Adv Perit Dial, 1994;10:195-198.
5 Hamilton-Miller, Shah, S, Shah, C, "Silver Sulphadiazine: A Comprehensive in vitro Reassessment," Chemotherapy, 1993; 39:406.
6 Moyasar, TY, et al., "Disinfection of Bacteria in Water Systems by Using Electrolytically Generated Copper, Silver and Reduced Levels of Free Chlorine," Canadian Journal of Microbiology, The National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ont., Canada, 1990; p. 109-16.
7 Larry C. Ford, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCLA School of Medicine, Center for the Health Sciences, November 1, 1988.
8 Goetz, A, Tracy, RL, Harris, FS, "Oligodynamic Effect of Silver," Silver in Industry, edited by L. Addicks, Reinhold Publishing Corp., NY, 1940; p. 403.
9 Grier, N, "Silver and Its Compounds." In: Disinfection, Sterilization and Preservation, S. Block, edit., Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1983; p. 379.
10 Hall, RE, Bender, G, Marquis, RE, "Inhibitory and Cidal Antimicrobial Actions of Electrically Generated Silver Ions," J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1987; 45:781.
11 Brigham Young University, Microbiology Department, May 13th, 1999; Ron W. Leavitt, PhD, Prof. Microbiology; ref: ASAP – 1.25 ppm to 10 ppm concentrate of Ag+.
12 Russell, AD, Hugo, WB, "Antimicrobial Activity and Action of Silver," Prog Med Chem, 1994; 31:356. 13 Deitch, E.A., Marino, A.A., Gillespie, T.E., and Albright, J.A. "Silver-nylon: A New Antimicrobial Agent," Antimicrob. Agents Chemother, 1983;23:356.
14 Marino, AA, EA Deitch, V Malakanok, JA Albright, RD Specian, "Electrical Augmentation of the Antrimicrobial Activity of Silver-Nylon Fabrics," J. Biol. Phys., 1984; 12:93.
15 Hamilton-Miller, Shah, S, Shah, C, "Silver Sulphadiazine: A Comprehensive in vitro Reassessment," Chemotherapy, 1993; 39:406.
16 Johns Hopkins University, Department of Pathology, Division of Microbiology, Feb 14th, 1997, James D. Dick, PhD, Director of Bacteriology; Ref: Aqua Argentica.
17 Grier, N, "Silver and Its Compounds." In: Disinfection, Sterilization and Preservation, S. Block, edit., Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1983; p. 380.
18 Monafo, WW, Moyer, CA, "Effectiveness of Dilute Aqueous Silver Nitrate in the Treatment of Major Burns," Arch Surg, July 1965; 91:205.
19 Microbiochem, Inc., Laboratoire D’Analyse, Quebec, Canada, July 3rd, 1996; Real Ayotte, PhD, Ref: Aqua Argentica.
20 Hamilton-Miller, Shah, S, Shah, C, "Silver Sulphadiazine: A Comprehensive in vitro Reassessment," Chemotherapy, 1993; 39:406.
21 Williams, RL, Grashoff, GJ, Williams, DF, "The Biocompatibility of Silver," Critical Reviews in Biocompatibility, 1989; 5(3):223.
22 Searle, A B, The Use of Colloids in Health and Disease, (Quoting Henry Crookes), E. P. Dutton and Company, NY, 1919; p. 70.
23 Bechhold, H, Colloids in Biology and Medicine, translated by J. G. M. Bullow. D. Van Nostrand Company, New York, 1919; p. 368.
24 Bechhold, H, Colloids in Biology and Medicine, translated by J. G. M. Bullow. D. Van Nostrand Company, New York, 1919; p. 368.
25 Williams, RL, Grashoff, GJ, Williams, DF, "The Biocompatibility of Silver," Critical Reviews in Biocompatibility, 1989; 5(3):223.
26 Carr, George, MD - "CVM3 Project", World Health Organization 1977 - 1999

*Murpirocin - PRONUNCIATION: (myou-PEER-oh-sin) COMMON BRAND NAME(S): Bactroban

SIDE EFFECTS: Burning, itching, stinging, headache, or nausea may occur. If any of these effects persist or worsen, notify your doctor or pharmacist promptly. Remember that your doctor has prescribed this medication because he or she has judged that the benefit to you is greater than the risk of side effects. Many people using this medication do not have serious side effects. Seek immediate medical attention if a rash or severe itching occurs. Use of this medication for prolonged or repeated periods may result in a new infection (e.g., fungal infection). Contact your doctor if you notice signs of a new infection. This is not a complete list of possible side effects. If you notice other effects not listed above, contact your doctor or pharmacist. Contact your doctor for medical advice about side effects.

PRECAUTIONS: Before using mupirocin, tell your doctor or pharmacist if you are allergic to it; or if you have any other allergies. Before using this medication, tell your doctor or pharmacist your medical history. This medication should be used only when clearly needed during pregnancy. Discuss the risks and benefits with your doctor. It is not known whether this drug passes into breast milk. Consult your doctor before breast-feeding.

DRUG INTERACTIONS: Your doctor or pharmacist may already be aware of any possible drug interactions and may be monitoring you for them. Do not start, stop, or change the dosage of any medicine before checking with them first. Before using this medication, tell your doctor or pharmacist of all prescription and nonprescription/herbal products you may use, especially of: chloramphenicol. This document does not contain all possible interactions. Therefore, before using this product, tell your doctor or pharmacist of all the products you use. Keep a list of all your medications with you, and share the list with your doctor and pharmacist.

OVERDOSE: If overdose is suspected, contact your local poison control center or emergency room immediately. This medicine may be harmful if swallowed.

NOTES: Do not share this medication with others. This medication has been prescribed for your current condition only. Do not use it later for another infection unless told to do so by your doctor. A different medication may be necessary in those cases.

MISSED DOSE: If you miss a dose, use it as soon as you remember. If it is near the time of the next dose, skip the missed dose and resume your usual dosing schedule. Do not double the dose to catch up.

STORAGE: Store at or below 77 degrees F (25 degrees C). Do not freeze. Do not store in the bathroom. Keep all medicines away from children and pets. Do not flush medications down the toilet or pour them into a drain unless instructed to do so. Properly discard this product when it is expired or no longer needed. Consult your pharmacist or local waste disposal company for more details about how to safely discard your product.

History of Mandatory Vaccination

History of Mandatory Vaccination

Rima Laibow, MD

Mandatory Vaccination has a long history which is not generally known, but deserves to be understood.Crunchy Mama wrote the following excellent article posted on Exploring Vaccines. It provides a good overview of the process by which States have come to the point where they are now requiring as many as 78 vaccines by the time a child reaches 15 years of age, starting at birth. The same Hepatitis B vaccine, by the way, that infants are given within 12 hours of birth is literally under indictment in France where the manufacturer has been charged with homicide because of the number of infants who have died following this injection. No such reservations seem to deter the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) from advising this same, and other highly questionable vaccinations.Once the ACIP makes its recommendations, States frequently adopt these recommendation and make the requirements mandatory for school entry.

In New Jersey, the issue has been pressed further with a new law now making its way through the legislature which would require home schooled children to meet the same mandatory vaccination schedule approved by the superintendent of schools, not the child’s parents or physician in order to be permitted to continue as a home schooled child.

This unconstitutional and irrational move, from a State with a significant number of vaccine manufacturer headquarters is, we believe, a portent of things to come unless the people of the US make a concerted outcry against this imposition of pharmaceutical profits on personal and religious rights.The religious exemption is being made more difficult to attain.

It is important to note that currently the trend to accept ALL recommendations made by the ACIP is gaining momentum and only vigorous activity by each of us can stop this trend which is damaging our health AND our freedom.

Did you know, by the way, that children are not immunized until they reach the age of 2 years in the UK? Or that vaccinations are widely spaced in Japan? In neither country are children dying of the diseases that supposedly are prevented by vaccination? Perhaps that should suggest that it is hygeine, not vaccination, which prevents these diseases. Perhaps it should also suggest that the Pharmaceutical Industry has a (literally speaking) death grip on US society. Properly used drugs are the leading cause of death in the US, according to the esteemed Journal of the American Medical Association and other journals of equal statue. But we continue to allow, encourage and often require their use. Vaccines, of course, are a particularly contentious and, to my mind, dangerous class of drugs sold into the market place not only through propaganda, but through legislative compulsion.

It is no news that all vaccines are contaminated by dangerous heavy metals including mercury and aluminum as well as fluoride and neurotoxins like formaldehyde, MSG, aspartame, viral particles, including stealth viruses, and cancer causing viruses and stray particles. It is no secret that human (including fetal tissue) materials like DNA are contaminants of viruses, along with dangerous chemicals like Polysorbate 80, linked to infertility.

It is less well know that the adjuvants, which are basically immune irritants, put into vaccines to increase the amount of antibody formation produced by vaccines which, without the adjuvants would not produce enough antibody response to be justified, are themselves serious dangers to health. For example, squalene is more or less harmless if breathed, applied to the skin or swallowed. But as the disastrous Vaccine A experimenets on our troops in the Gulf War have tragically demonstrated, once injected, squalene is the source of immense immune overload and finally, immune collapse in a devastating set of problems lumped together under the term “Gulf War Syndrome”. Most modern vaccines include adjuvants, many of which are secret ingredients, but often include squalene.

Further concern centers around secret ingredients which are not even trade secrets: they are depopulation agents. The World Health Organization (WHO) was recently convicted by the Supreme Court of the Philippines of sterilizing at least 3 million women through the use of a vaccine intentionally contaminated with a human hormone which is necessary for reproduction in women. By including it in vaccines, this hormone causes the body to produce antibodies to it which renders the woman unable to carry a baby although her ability to conceive is not impaired.

According to WHO records, this same depopulation strategy was used in vaccines given to African women starting in 1985 to “eliminate 150 million EXCESS sub Saharan Africans [Emphasis added by me to a quote from WHO documents - REL]. It has been used via a “special” tetanus vaccine series of 5 shots generously given to poor women in South and Central America, Thailand, Africa and elsewhere. The WHO maintains that for the planet to achieve “sustainability” it must have 80-90% fewer people on it than it does today. Its vaccine fertility control task forces for the control of male and female fertility have been operating since 1974, the same year that then-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger prepared Memorandum 200 for then-President Nixon stating that depopulation had to be the US first priority in Foreign Policy, beginning with [note, beginning with- REL] the third world.

As an interesting side note, it is important to consider that a vaccine rendering young women sterile, supposedly for 1 year, is being sold in the US as a birth control option. No one knows if the results are, in fact, induced sterility for one year or not. Life-long sterility could be the result. Time will tell.

This same contamination of vaccines with Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG), the female hormone necessary to carry a baby to term, is intentionally included in the vaccine everypregnant Thai tribal woman is forced to take. Without it, she is told, her baby cannot receive the important identity card. Once she receives the shot from the Department of Health worker, she will inevitably miscarry, no matter how far along the pregnancy is.Evidence which I find compelling suggests strongly that material designed to drive the immune system, specifically the CD-4 cells, to collapse, opening the way for a host of opportunistic diseases (this induced condition is known by the collective term HIV/AIDS).

The manufacturer of the Hepatitis B vaccine, the same ones given to our children and health care providers, is currently on trial for homicide in France because of the number of deaths caused in infants and others because of known contaminants. Due to the ever-corporate friendly protective nature of the relationship of the US Congress and the FDA, vaccine-injured people in the US cannot hold doctors or manufacturers accountable and cannot sue them for the damages incurred. On a positive note, that wall of non-protection has been breeched in a Georgia case in which a Federal judge has ruled that parents may sue a vaccine manufacturer for damage to their child.

This landmark case may open a door which regulation and legislation has shut for Americans, as the consent by the CDC in the Vaccine Injury Special Court system that a 9 year old autistic girl was vaccine injured because of a supposedly rare mitochondrial disorder and is thus entitled to compensation for her care may open a small doorway for vaccine injured children.

The bigger door, however, is to make sure that no one IS vaccine injured or, if they chose to run the risk of such injuries, that they will be free to do so in the full knowledge of the risks incurred by submitting to vaccination.

Currently, the US has announced its determination to vaccinate every man, woman and child in the US with an Avian Flu vaccine made in China by Sanofi-Pasteur and loaded into individual dose syringes in Pennsylvania. This vaccine was approved by the FDA in the complete absence of any formal clinical trials (although apparently informal ones have been conducted in Poland where the impact of the vaccine on the over 300 vagrants vaccinated include 11 immediate deaths and hundreds of reactions so severe that the 2 physicians and 4 nurses involved in the “trial” are now accused of homicide. The Minister of Health of Poland has said that none of the accused should ever be permitted to practice medicine or nursing again. This same vaccine is, according to our information, the stuff waiting for the compliant arms of “every man, woman and child in the United States”.

Further information suggests that not only the Avian Flu virus itself, but the very vaccines designed to “protect” us against it (although the science behind ANY vaccine protecting us from anything is worse than questionable) has also been weaponized.

Two biochemistry/microbiology researchers were brutally tortured and murdered on June 29,208 in London, England. Their computer was stolen shortly before their murder. These researchers were, according to information released recently, murdered by a British-Mossad assassination team now in custody in the UK. The researchers had uncovered information leading to the conclusion that not only was the Avian Flu virus itself weaponized with genetic material from the 1918 pandemic “Spanish Flu” (which was not Spanish at all, but created in the US as the first, and most successful Bio Weapon of all time on orders of then-President Teddy Roosevelt and injected into US Soldiers in Kansas before they were sent to Spain for “training” and exposure to mutation-inducing poison gases)but the vaccines supposedly being created to protect the population from the approaching pandemic Avian Flu had also been weaponized to produce a deadly disease upon injection.

Their horrific murders and the subsequent apprehension of their professional killers was covered by the European press, but totally ignored by all US media. The story of their discoveries was also totally neglected by the US media.

The Natural Solutions Foundation’s press release was censored by the media outlet we attempted to use to bring this attention to the light of day and request substantiation of this vitally important information by the media outlet which published it in September, 2008.
Mandatory vaccination for mumps was imposed on college students in Maine last December 11, 2007. Students who were not vaccinated or chose to refuse vaccination were locked out of their dormitories, dining halls, libraries, student unions and classrooms when their key cards were inactivated. This happened on the same day that Health Canada withdrew approval for the same vaccine for use in children and adults because of its dangers. Students, whose tuition, room and board were already paid for, were denied access to instruction and shelter, food and resources in the winter time without notice.Mandatory vaccination is now being recommended for college students, especially those in dorm, even though, as the article making this recommendation states, last year’s flu vaccine did not “cover” one of two viruses causing the flu. This year’s flu vaccine will supposedly contain 4 viruses in an attempt to avoid last year’s embarrassing failure by the CDC and World Health Organization (WHO) to “guess” right in the spring before the flu season hit. Each year, these organizations decide what the offending virus is likely to be in the next flu season and authorize vaccines against those viruses which are then recommended (or mandated) as the “flu shot”. Last year, as often happens, the guess was wrong and the CDC announced that the vaccine was ineffective from 40-60% of the time.

Given that 94% of the flu vaccine available contained thimerisol (50% mercury by weight)as well as the usual toxins, and whatever else the vials might be hiding, and that both children and adults are susceptible to the toxic impact of these biological and chemical components, this tetravalent vaccination does not suggest any more safety than the previous ones, including the disastrous and deadly Swine Flu vaccine) offer.

New Jersey made headlines last November by announcing that it would require mandatory flu vaccination for all children in the state from age 6 months (2 shots in the first year) to age 18 plus meningococcus and Hepatitis B shots for all children in the state at various times in their school career.

Now this state, home to so many major pharmaceutical companies, has taken the mandatory vaccination thrust a step farther: all children, whether enrolled in school or home schooled, MUST receive the vaccines approved by the Superintendent of Schools for the child’s home district or be refused permission to stay in a home schooled environment.

Despite the total global absence of a pandemic strain of Avian Flu and despite excellent evidence that non toxic strategies like nanosilver ingestion and hygiene measures are sufficient to kill any Avian Flu virus yet identified, the thrust is toward untested, potentially very dangerous, and scientifically absurd vaccinations. These vaccines, however, carry a hefty price tag: the Sanofi-Pasteur vaccine, approved by the FDA on an “emergency basis” for a disease that does not exist, and slated for use in every person in the US, and approved in the absence of any formal trials, was purchased by the US Government for the hefty price of $15 per dose, or $1.5 billion dollars for 100 million doses. This vaccine shipment, the first of several if all Americans will receive at least one dose, gives the US government a tight exclusive on the vaccine preventing price cutting or competition: in its approval documentation, the fact that the vaccine cannot be sold to any agency or customer other than the US Government is stipulated.

This stipulation means that the ingredients are not listed, do not have to be listed, may not be listed on the package insert or elsewhere.

Americans were notified on July 23, 2008 by the FDA and on July 24, 2008 by the Department of Homeland Security, that the intention of the US Government is to vaccinate every person in the US with this vaccine “starting with those who want it”. Americans are well aware that Patriot Act I and II, BioShield I and II and BARDA all make mandatory vaccination a requirement to avoid involuntary internment and quarantine.

They are also well aware that hundreds of thousands of plastic coffins have been purchased by the US Government and are sitting in depots, including the one famously photographed in Georgia.American know that every state in the country has passed a version of the Emergency Medical Powers Act which makes refusing treatment, especially vaccination, once a “Pandemic” has been declared by the governor of the state, a felony which, as such, can be punished by incarceration or internment.They are well informed about the fact that the US Government is reported to have purchased at least one large tract of land in upstate New York for a mass burial site and that the UK has announced mass burial plans as well since cremation would, according to the estimates of the British Parliament, run up to 17 weeks behind deaths despite increased crematoria capacity building recently undertaken.All this for a disease that does not yet exist.

Americans are also aware that US troops have been moved into place to control civil disruption, subdue unruly persons relocate persons as necessary in a permanent domestic duty deployment which began October 1, 2008. The 1st Battle Group of the 3rd Infantry has been placed under the permanent command of NorthCom, the Northern Command of the US Army. NorthCom signed a much hearalded agreement with the Canadian Military to allow Canadian troops access to US territory for the same reasons and US troops have been operating in Canada performing domestic duties since April, 2007.

This, of course, follows the integration of the US FDA, Canadian HealthCanada and Mexican Department of Health under the Trilateral Cooperation Charter in 2003, erasing further the sovereign powers and status of the United States.

So Americans are well aware of the vaccine threats lurking. They remember well the November, 2007 atrocity in which Prince George’s County imposed vaccination under the amused and watchful eye of a judge (who remarked that the crying children were “kind of cute”) on threat of imprisonment and fines for parents of unvaccinated children and re vaccinated 1100 children whose records it admitted it had lost but who were fully vaccinated. They also remember the interviews granted by State’s Attorney Glen Ivey, father of young children, who admitted that he would not allow his own children to receive the vaccines which were being administered under police and attack dog guard in the Court House that tragic November Saturday. Maryland is among the states which allow parents to file an exemption if they do not want their children to receive the vaccines offered. These parents, mostly poor, black (like Attorney Ivey) and uneducated, from the one of the poorest school districts in the nation, were not told of their option to refuse these vaccinations.

The Natural Solutions Foundation asks you to take effective and vigorous action by notifying your state and federal legislators that these compulsory vaccination precedents are not acceptable to you. Please take a moment to sign the Tiburon Declaration, which takes issue with compulsory drugging, including vaccination, and which will be presented to all US legislators when we have amassed enough signatures. Then please take another moment to take each of the action steps listed above if you have not already done so, to raise the voice of the net roots loud and clear so that legislators understand that they are playing with your health freedom and that you do not like that and will not allow that to continue.

How School Vaccine Mandates Came About

In 1809, the first state law mandating vaccination was enacted in Massachusetts. By 1855, Massachusetts became the first state to enact a school vaccination requirement for Smallpox. By the twentieth century, roughly half of the states had enacted vaccine mandates for children before they could enter school; however, they were not strictly enforced. The Diphtheria vaccine was introduced in the 1920’s, but only a few states made the Diphtheria vaccine compulsory for two decades. By the early 1950’s, with the licensure of the Diphtheria and Tetanus vaccines, state and local health departments began more aggressive vaccination programs. When the Salk Polio vaccine was licensed in 1955, only a few states passed laws that mandated it for school entry. The polio vaccine also led to federal funding of state and local vaccine programs. In 1962, the Vaccination Assistance Act established a federally coordinated program that would supply funds for the purchase and administration of childhood vaccines. By 1963, several vaccines were mandated, but there was no enforcement by all states. The New York City health commissioner opposed making the Polio vaccine mandatory in 1965.

Compulsory vaccination made some radical changes by the late 1960’s and 1970’s. In 1970 a nationwide rubella vaccine campaign was launched. It was recommended by the Department of Health for all 11-13 year old girls. Then the CDC moved on and began leading a nationwide effort to eradicate Measles. In 1968, only a half the states required one or more vaccines for school entry. By the early 1970’s, the Measles Initiative program was started. By 1976-77, health officials strictly enforced the vaccine mandate for Measles under the Childhood immunization Initiative. Its purpose was to raise vaccination coverage in children to 90% by 1979. The largest component of this initiative was to enact and enforce school vaccination mandates.

By 1981, all fifty states mandated Measles vaccine along with all others for school entry. Nearly all states had school vaccination mandates covering Kindergarten through 12th grade levels, and mandates for licensed preschools. State mandated vaccine laws specified which vaccines would be required and the number of doses. Some states authorized the public health boards to designate which vaccines and doses would be required. States were not uniform in what vaccines they require, or how many doses. This still holds true today. In 1980, the state of Wisconsin passed the No-immunization-No School law and was enforced by March 1981. Other states soon followed.

In 1998–1999, all but four states (Louisiana, Michigan, South Carolina, and West Virginia) enacted mandates which covered Kindergarten through 12th grade. In 48 states, with the exception of Iowa and West Virginia, daycare mandates and Head Start program mandates were enacted. Thirty states mandated some requirements for college entrance. School vaccine mandates included:

All 50 states required: Diphtheria toxoid, Polio, Measles and Rubella vaccines

49 states required: Tetanus toxoid

46 states required: Mumps

44 states required: Pertussis

28 states required: Hepatitis B

During the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, state vaccine laws were tightened to make religious and philosophical exemptions harder to obtain. By the end of the 1990’s, the trend was reversed. Religious and Philosophical exemptions were made less restrictive through rewriting exemption clauses.

The Task Force on Community Preventive Services is an independent body carrying out evidence-based reviews of the literature to assess the claims that preventive interventions directed to populations are effective. One of the 17 interventions reviewed for vaccine-preventable diseases was mandatory vaccination requirements. The Task Force found that sufficient evidence existed to demonstrate the effectiveness of these requirements in increasing vaccine coverage, thereby reducing disease incidence, and so recommended their use.

U.S. Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in 1986 and the Vaccine Compensation Amendments in 1987 and 1995. The NCVIA establishes a compensation system for people who may be injured by routine vaccinations. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Public Law 99-660, was signed by President Reagan in November 1986, however, it did not contain a funding mechanism to enable the compensation system to operate. In 1987, Congress passed amendments to the law and developed a plan to fund the system, which comes from a surcharge on each mandatory vaccine. The main purpose of the law was to create safety provisions for the administration of vaccines to help prevent future vaccine injuries, to promote the improvement of existing vaccines and develop safer vaccines. Another element was to create a no-fault compensation system alternative to suing vaccine manufacturers and physicians on behalf of injured or deceased people from reactions to mandated vaccines. Children and/or adults injured or killed from these vaccines are divided into two categories; those who were damaged or killed before October 1, 1988 and those who were damaged or killed after that date. In 1990, the FDA and the CDC developed the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which allows public and private physicians to use one standard reporting form to report reactions.

Reference:
http://explorevaccines.wordpress.com/2008/10/08/vaccine-state-mandates/#comment-41

Got Bionaid?

http://www.bionaid.com